Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/300241 
Year of Publication: 
2024
Series/Report no.: 
ZEW Discussion Papers No. 24-037
Publisher: 
ZEW - Leibniz-Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung, Mannheim
Abstract: 
Independent and high-quality evaluations of government policies are an important input for designing evidence-based policy. Lack of incentives and institutions to write such evaluations, on the other hand, carry the risk of turning the system into a costly beauty contest. We study one of the most advanced markets of policy evaluations in the world, the evaluations of EU Cohesion Policies by its Member States (MS). We use large language models quantify the findings of about 2,300 evaluations, and complement this data with our own survey of the authors. We show that the findings of evaluations are inconsistent with those of the academic literature on the output impacts of Cohesion Policy. Using further variation across MS, our analysis suggests that the market of evaluations is rather oligopolistic within MS, that it is very fragmented across the EU, and that there is often a strong involvement of managing authorities in the work of formally independent evaluators. These factors contribute to making the findings of the evaluations overly optimistic (beautiful) risking their overall usefulness (evidence-based policy). We conclude by discussing reform options to make the evaluations of EU Cohesion Policies more unbiased and effective.
Subjects: 
Policy Evaluation
EU Cohesion Policy
Large Language Model
JEL: 
A11
C45
D83
H43
H54
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.