Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/300327 
Year of Publication: 
2024
Series/Report no.: 
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. TI 2024-045/V
Publisher: 
Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam and Rotterdam
Abstract: 
We estimate responsibility-sensitive welfare weights for health that facilitate inequalityand inequity-sensitive policy evaluation. In a UK general population sample, 569 online experiment participants distribute constrained resources to determine the health of hypothetical individuals distinguished by randomly generated resource productivity as well as sex, income and smoking (41,460 observations). We elicit beliefs about responsibility for income and smoking, and use their associations with the allocations to estimate responsibility-sensitive weights that reflect inequality aversion and health prioritisation by the non-health characteristics. There is slight, moderate and substantial prioritisation of females, the poor and non-smokers, respectively. Inequality aversion lowers weights on females and non-smokers, who are health-advantaged, and raises the weight on the poor, who are health-disadvantaged. As beliefs about responsibility for income and smoking strengthen, weights on the poor decrease and weights on non-smokers significantly increase.
Subjects: 
Experiment
Social Preferences
Inequality Aversion
Equity
JEL: 
C90
D30
D63
I14
I38
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.