Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/300976 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2024
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 17080
Verlag: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Zusammenfassung: 
Using data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, we estimate the impact of breastfeeding initiation and duration on multiple cognitive, health, and behavioral outcomes spanning early childhood through adolescence. To mitigate the potential bias from misspecification, we employ a doubly robust (DR) estimation method, addressing misspecification in either the treatment or outcome models while adjusting for selection effects. Our novel approach is to use and evaluate a battery of supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms to improve propensity score (PS) estimates. We demonstrate that the gradient boosting machine (GBM) algorithm removes bias more effectively and minimizes other prediction errors compared to logit and probit models as well as alternative ML algorithms. Across all outcomes, our DR-GBM estimation generally yields lower estimates than OLS, DR, and PS matching using standard and alternative ML algorithms and even sibling fixed effects estimates. We find that having been breastfed is significantly linked to multiple improved early cognitive outcomes, though the impact reduces somewhat with age. In contrast, we find mixed evidence regarding the impact of breastfeeding on non-cognitive (health and behavioral) outcomes, with effects being most pronounced in adolescence. Our results also suggest relatively higher cognitive benefits for children of minority mothers and children of mothers with at least some post-high school education, and minimal marginal benefits of breastfeeding duration beyond 12 months for cognitive outcomes and 6 months for non-cognitive outcomes.
Schlagwörter: 
breastfeeding
human capital
cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes
doubly robust estimation
machine learning
JEL: 
I12
I18
J13
J24
C21
C63
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
1.75 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.