Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/301155 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2024
Series/Report no.: 
WZB Discussion Paper No. SP V 2024-502
Publisher: 
Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin
Abstract: 
How do judicial decisions influence political discourse, particularly in areas as contentious as abortion rights? This study investigates how the overturning of Roe v. Wade affected the narrative strategies of U.S. representatives on social media, focusing on variations by party affiliation and geography. While there is literature on the influence of judicial decisions on public opinion and policy, the effect on political narratives remains underexplored. To address this gap, the study analyzes 5,293 tweets from U.S. representatives in 2022 by supervised text classification and statistical modeling to identify shifts in narrative strategies. The study found the leaked opinion draft acted as a catalyst, which prompted an increase in stories of decline-narratives that emphasize a worsening situation-particularly for Republicans. This study provides empirical evidence of how political narratives evolve in response to landmark judicial changes and insights into the strategic use of narratives by political actors in digital communication.
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.