Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/301430 
Year of Publication: 
2024
Series/Report no.: 
I4R Discussion Paper Series No. 141
Publisher: 
Institute for Replication (I4R), s.l.
Abstract: 
Graduating economics PhDs face intense competition when seeking faculty or research positions at universities and research institutions. We examine the relationship between statistically significant results, arguably used as indicators of research quality in a competitive academic market, and academic hiring outcomes. We start by investigating the determinants of academic success by analyzing 604 job market papers (JMPs) from 2018-2019 to 2020- 2021. We then turn to the practice of p-hacking focusing on 150 empirical JMPs. We find evidence that marginally significant results in JMPs are associated with higher academic placement likelihoods. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a tighter job market strengthened this relationship without altering the p-hacking behavior of PhD candidates, suggesting that our results reflect a recruitment bias by academic employers. We also find evidence of publication bias, suggesting that recruiters may use statistical significance to gauge candidates' potential for future publications, thus influencing recruitment decisions. Overall, our findings provide insights into the dynamics of the academic job market and the factors influencing career trajectories in academia.
Subjects: 
Academic job market
p-Hacking
Publication bias
Research credibility
JEL: 
B41
C13
C40
C93
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.