Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/307318 
Year of Publication: 
2024
Series/Report no.: 
CHOPE Working Paper No. 2024-10
Publisher: 
Duke University, Center for the History of Political Economy (CHOPE), Durham, NC
Abstract: 
I argue that the outbreak of the Great War facilitated a shift in the dominant view of human nature within the Cambridge-Bloomsbury intelligentsia, steering it away from an optimistic view toward a pessimistic one. The conceptualization of human reason and rationality within this group, however, remained intact throughout the war. Frank Ramsey and John Maynard Keynes produced some of their most notable works within this evolving intellectual context. They followed the interwar orthodoxy by adopting its description of human nature. But they departed from the orthodoxy by revising its underlying conceptual commitment concerning what constitutes human reason and rationality. I show that Ramsey and Keynes developed their ideas in tandem. They both argued for the pragmatist idea that our normative theory of human life ought to be sensitive to what we can ask from human nature. Ramsey made this argument in his philosophy. Keynes made it in his economics.
Subjects: 
Frank Ramsey
John Maynard Keynes
Reason
Intellectualism
Pragmatism
JEL: 
B1
B2
B3
B4
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.