Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10419/59629
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Al-Najjar, Nabil I. | en |
dc.contributor.author | De Castro, Luciano I. | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-08-04 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-07-12T12:33:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-07-12T12:33:38Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/59629 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This note questions the behavioral content of second-order acts and their use in decision theoretic models. We show that there can be no verification mechanism to determine what the decision maker receives under a second-order act. This impossibility applies even in idealized repeated experiments where infinite data can be observed. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.publisher | |aNorthwestern University, Kellogg School of Management, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science |cEvanston, IL | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | |aDiscussion Paper |x1531 | en |
dc.subject.ddc | 330 | en |
dc.title | Observability and "second-order acts" | - |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
dc.identifier.ppn | 665455933 | en |
dc.rights | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | en |
dc.identifier.repec | RePEc:nwu:cmsems:1531 | en |
Files in This Item:
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.