Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10419/63321
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Nafziger, E. Wayne | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-21T09:28:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-09-21T09:28:25Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | - |
dc.identifier.isbn | 929190788X | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/63321 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The paper compares perspectives on the meaning of development in the late 1970s and early 1980s to the contemporary period, with a focus on the works of Dudley Seers and Amartya Sen. Both men were critical of the development literature of their times. Seers was especially critical of neoclassicism’s universal claims and economic growth as the prime objective. For Sen, development involves reducing deprivation or broadening choice. One challenge for future work is for development economists, similar to Seers and Sen, to be more holistic, integrating economic development, human rights, and conflict reduction. – inequality ; poverty ; employment ; growth ; neoclassicism ; entitlement ; famine | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.publisher | |aThe United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER) |cHelsinki | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | |aWIDER Research Paper |x2006/20 | en |
dc.subject.jel | B2 | en |
dc.subject.jel | O1 | en |
dc.subject.ddc | 330 | en |
dc.subject.stw | Entwicklungstheorie | en |
dc.title | From Seers to Sen: The meaning of economic development | - |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
dc.identifier.ppn | 510834566 | en |
dc.rights | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | en |
Files in This Item:
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.