Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/72999 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2013
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Nota di Lavoro No. 21.2013
Verlag: 
Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Milano
Zusammenfassung: 
That climate policies are costly is evident and therefore often creates major fears. But the alternative (no action) also has a cost. Mitigation costs and damages incurred depend on what the climate policies are; moreover, they are substitutes. This brings climate policies naturally in the realm of benefit-cost analysis. In this paper we illustrate the direct cost components of various policies, and then confront them with the benefits generated, that is, the damage cost avoided. However, the sheer benefit-cost criterion is not a sufficient incentive to induce cooperation among countries, a necessary condition for an effective global climate policy. Thus, we also explore how to use this criterion in the context of international climate cooperation.
Schlagwörter: 
Climate Policy
Integrated Assessment
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Climate Cooperation
JEL: 
Q54
H87
D61
D9
F42
Q2
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
987.4 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.